share

In the realm of historical enigmas, few are as captivating as the lost city of Atlantis. But could this mythical metropolis be hiding in plain sight, not beneath the ocean’s depths, but under the sands of the Sahara? New theories and re-examinations of ancient texts point towards the “Eye of Africa,” or Richat Structure, as the potential resting place of this legendary civilization.

A Perfect Match?

The Richat Structure, a spectacular geological feature in the Adrar Plateau of Mauritania, bears an uncanny resemblance to the descriptions of Atlantis given by Plato. Known for its near-perfect circular formation, this geological wonder spans approximately 23.5 kilometers in diameter, a size that matches Plato’s account of the city’s dimensions in ancient stadia. Plato described Atlantis as having concentric rings of land and water, a layout that the Eye of Africa visually echoes when viewed from above.

Geological Clues and Ancient Texts

Some researchers argue that the structure’s formation could be explained by both natural geological processes and human intervention. According to posts on X, enthusiasts like Bright Insight have highlighted how the Eye of Africa shows signs of water erosion and even salt deposits, suggesting that this part of the Sahara was once flooded, aligning with theories that Atlantis was engulfed by water rather than sunk beneath it.

Moreover, the presence of ancient artifacts, including Acheulean tools, around the Richat Structure, as noted by various web sources, might indicate a civilization’s presence far older than previously thought, potentially dating back to the time Plato suggested for Atlantis. This coincides with the African humid period, where the Sahara was lush with vegetation and water bodies, providing a plausible environment for a major city-state.

The Myth Meets Reality

While many scholars dismiss Atlantis as a rhetorical device used by Plato, there’s a growing chorus of voices advocating for a reevaluation. The Eye of Africa’s unique geological features, including its concentric rings, are seen by some as too coincidental to ignore. The structure’s visibility from space has long made it a landmark for astronauts, but could it also be a beacon from our distant past?

A New Expedition?

The idea isn’t without its critics, who argue that the lack of definitive archaeological evidence of a city undermines any claim to Atlantis. However, this hasn’t stopped speculation or the call for more in-depth exploration. If Atlantis were built into a natural formation like the Richat Structure, as some suggest on social media, it would explain both the absence of clear man-made structures and the presence of natural features that match ancient descriptions.

Conclusion

The theory that the Eye of Africa might be Atlantis challenges our understanding of history and geography. While the mainstream academic community remains skeptical, the conversation around this theory is growing, fueled by new interpretations of ancient texts, geological studies, and the enduring human fascination with lost civilizations. Perhaps it’s time to dust off the old maps, not of the sea, but of the Sahara, and look for Atlantis where we least expect it—to find it not lost to the depths but hidden beneath the world’s largest desert.

---